I figured I'd let all the real bloggers post their thoughts about the
presidential debates last week. First of all, I think it's a bit of
stretch to call them debates - they really were more like simultaneous
campaign commercials. I am glad though that people from both sides were
able to listen to both of the candidates, something I don't do myself
either. But then again, I get my news from the daily show so I'm just a
stoned slacker.
I think Kerry came off looking as the better prepared candidate. Bush
kept saying the same things over and over no matter what the question
was. I was also quite annoying that he kept asking JIm Lehrer for extra
time to answer Kerry's responses - sort of a "What I meant to
say...".
The most memorable Bush moment was in response to being asked,
essentially, why Iraq was such a mess. His answer sounded like "Well,
we didn't expect to win so fast. When it came time to fight us, the
insurgents wouldn't face us directly and resort to guerrila tactics."
Well no freakin' duh! What exactly did he expect an insurgent force to
do against a much, much better prepared, trained, and equiped force. Is
he trying to resurrect military tactics more popular during the 16th
century? Is each side supposed to be drawing up their lines and facing
each other as civilized gentlemen? I remember another insurgent force
that had to face a bigger, better equipped invading army, it's a bit
hazy but I think I learned about it in my American History classes...
Finally, since its related to how the current administration is running
their campaign for another four years, I suggest you all view this movie
to see how Bush and the GOP use terrorism and
9/11.